Which statement about session frequency is supported by the Geld et al. 2013 framework?

Which statement about session frequency is supported by the Geld et al. 2013 framework?

• A. Sessions should occur daily.
• B. The protocol does not specify an optimal frequency.
• C. Sessions should occur hourly.
• D. Sessions should occur monthly.

Answer: (B)

Sessions are treated as a dose that should be customized to the person and the study goals, not a fixed rule. The Geld et al. 2013 framework emphasizes designing the protocol with flexibility so frequency can be adjusted based on the intervention’s aims, the participant’s needs, feasibility, and observed response. There isn’t a universal optimum prescribed; instead, researchers and clinicians decide how often to meet to best support outcomes while balancing practicality and engagement. That’s why stating that there is no single optimal frequency aligns with the framework. Choosing a fixed cadence like daily, hourly, or monthly would constrain applicability and ignore individual differences in progress, tolerance, and context. The framework’s approach supports adapting frequency to what makes sense for each case, rather than endorsing one rigid schedule.

Sessions are treated as a dose that should be customized to the person and the study goals, not a fixed rule. The Geld et al. 2013 framework emphasizes designing the protocol with flexibility so frequency can be adjusted based on the intervention’s aims, the participant’s needs, feasibility, and observed response. There isn’t a universal optimum prescribed; instead, researchers and clinicians decide how often to meet to best support outcomes while balancing practicality and engagement. That’s why stating that there is no single optimal frequency aligns with the framework.

Choosing a fixed cadence like daily, hourly, or monthly would constrain applicability and ignore individual differences in progress, tolerance, and context. The framework’s approach supports adapting frequency to what makes sense for each case, rather than endorsing one rigid schedule.